web-realestatelawhomeAt The Lyons Law Group, P.A. we are not wasting any time putting recent Florida Supreme Court decisions to use for our clients.  On November 3, 2016, the Florida Supreme Court rendered a decision in Bartram v. U.S. Bank, N.A., [citation] (Fla. 2016) confirming that lenders have a roaming five year statute of limitations to file foreclosure.  Bartram also bars lenders from seeking defaulted payments in a second foreclosure action that accrued prior to dismissal of the first foreclosure action.

 

“This is the Court’s way of leveling the playing field for homeowners,” says Andrew M. Lyons, Esq.  For the past several years, lenders have struggled to properly comply with the foreclosure procedures mandated by Florida law.  The result was that most cases were dismissed and refiled by the lender, alleging the exact same default date.  In the criminal context, it was like double jeopardy- a lender who was unsuccessful once could come back to court, unscathed, and seek the exact same thing based on the exact same facts.

 

To make matters worse, the property would sit vacant, in waste, and the neighborhood would deteriorate causing home values to plummet.  There was nothing to incentivize the lender to get the process right the first time; it could simply file a new case.   Bartram changes everything by barring any payments that accrued from the date of default through dismissal of the first foreclosure action. It seems as though the Court wants to send a message by penalizing a lender for wasting the Court’s resources when it fails to properly prosecute its first foreclosure action to a final judgment.

 

We are now reviewing our client’s files to ensure that we raise this argument for every client who has been the subject of successive foreclosures on the same loan.  The result remains to be seen, but it could mean barring the lender’s recovery of thousands of dollars in defaulted payments from our clients, or that the entire foreclosure should be dismissed.

 

by Rebbecca Goodall